Both surgeries were obscure and unpopular until a "minimally invasive" version led to mass-marketing.
Both surgeries featured positive stories in the media. Walter Freeman had several glowing write-ups in the New York Times and Life Magazine.
Both surgeries featured dubious published studies touting the safety and effectiveness. One very large 1962 study said that 28% had been cured by lobotomy, another 25% significantly improved, 20% showed no change (from lobotomy!!) 4% died, and only 2% were made worse off.
In both instances medical professionals were reluctant to openly criticize their colleagues or speak up about undisclosed harmful effects of the procedure.
http://etsandreversals.yuku.com/reply/9783/Lobotomy-Barbaric-surgery#reply-9783
"Sympathectomy is a technique about which we have limited knowledge, applied to disorders about which we have little understanding." Associate Professor Robert Boas, Faculty of Pain Medicine of the Australasian College of Anaesthetists and the Royal College of Anaesthetists The Journal of Pain, Vol 1, No 4 (Winter), 2000: pp 258-260
Cell body reorganization in the spinal cord after elective surgery to treat sweaty palms
The amount of compensatory sweating depends on the patient, the damage that the white rami communicans incurs, and the amount of cell body reorganization in the spinal cord after surgery.
Other potential complications include inadequate resection of the ganglia, gustatory sweating, pneumothorax, cardiac dysfunction, post-operative pain, and finally Horner’s syndrome secondary to resection of the stellate ganglion.
www.ubcmj.com/pdf/ubcmj_2_1_2010_24-29.pdf
Other potential complications include inadequate resection of the ganglia, gustatory sweating, pneumothorax, cardiac dysfunction, post-operative pain, and finally Horner’s syndrome secondary to resection of the stellate ganglion.
www.ubcmj.com/pdf/ubcmj_2_1_2010_24-29.pdf
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment